 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Jeanneret v. Judd & Assocs., CV990089069S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 20, 2003, Decided , February 20, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Industry custom of ceasing payment of sales agents' commissions 30 to 90 days after terminating agent amounted to forfeiture and was not allowed in agent's case, as it was not part of parties' oral contract; agent had right to all commissions earned.
|
|||||
| Jones v. Jones, 396712,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 20, 2003, Decided , February 20, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Wife's summary judgment motion in husband's breach of contract suit regarding an extra-judicial agreement to modify alimony was denied where she failed to prove that, based on divorce court's prior ruling, res judicata or collateral estoppel applied.
|
|||||
| Lebron v. Warden, CV000003240,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, February 20, 2003, Decided , February 20, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, wherein he alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective in allowing him to plead guilty without adequately offering him advice, was denied where no prejudice was shown.
|
|||||
| Marrero v. Rodriguez, FA000156846S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 20, 2003, Decided , February 20, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In divorce action, wife was awarded sole legal custody of child, husband having visitation rights, husband was ordered to pay weekly child support, and wife was ordered to quitclaim interest in marital residence to husband in exchange for $ 30,000.
|
|||||
| Redvers v. Kalosky, CV010096012S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 20, 2003, Decided , February 20, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to dismiss, which challenged probate court actions in appointing an administrator, filed in subsequent wrongful death suit brought by administrator, was denied where probate court actions were within its jurisdiction and were not appealed.
|
|||||
| Royce v. Probate Appeal, CV020346751S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 20, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an heir had a vested share in an estate and alleged that accounting errors adversely affected his pecuniary interests, he was aggrieved; because the sheriff's return of process was timely, the appellate court had jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Skirmont v. Drapp, CV010386982,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 20, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Soto v. Warden, CV023699,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 19 AT ROCKVILLE, February 20, 2003, Decided , February 20, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since petitioner failed both to show that his attorney's performance was deficient and that he was prejudiced, his habeas corpus assertions in regard to his guilty plea were wholly without merit. He also failed to show he was actually innocent.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
