 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Fleming v. Asea Brown Boveri, Inc., CV990586460,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 21, 2006, Decided , February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court reconsidered its award of lost earnings to an employee after the employer pointed out an error in the calculation.
|
|||||
| In re Laquasha H., F04CP00004660A, F04CP00004661A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, JUVENILE MATTERS AT BRIDGEPORT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Commitment of two siblings to Connecticut Department of Children and Families was revoked, and custody and guardianship was transferred to their maternal aunt. The aunt satisfied the criteria for guardians in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 45a-617, and the revocation of the commitment under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-129(m) was in the siblings' best interests.
|
|||||
| Lotto v. Hamden Bd. of Educ., CV054010436,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 21, 2006, Decided , February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Board of education's motion to strike parents' claims was granted because the board was entitled to governmental immunity as to an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, the parents failed to state a contractual promise that the board allegedly breached, and a private right of action did not exist under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-233d(d).
|
|||||
| Machado v. Statewide Griev. Comm., AC 26107,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 21, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Clear and convincing evidence supported the determination of the Statewide Grievance Committee that an attorney violated Conn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.2(a) and 1.4(a) where he did not work on a bankruptcy action that he was retained to handle for a client and he failed to apprise the client of the status thereof.
|
|||||
| Mann v. Miller, AC 26091,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 21, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court did not improperly determine the division of parties' marital assets in their marriage dissolution proceeding where it held that both parties were jointly liable for a home equity loan, as it properly considered the required factors in making its property division orders, pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-81.
|
|||||
| McCoy v. State Dep't of Envtl. Prot., CV054004616S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, February 21, 2006, Decided , February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Once environmental protection department moved to dismiss administrative appeal for failure to plead aggrievement, which attacked subject matter jurisdiction, court could not hear pleading to amend; since plaintiffs did not plead they owned property affected by agency action or aggrievement under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-183(a), appeal was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Newell v. McKernon, CV044000636S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, February 21, 2006, Decided , February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a nurse failed to provide proof that notice of her negligence suit against the owners was received by her employer, the employer's Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-293 motion to file an intervening complaint was granted.
|
|||||
| Reed v. Town of Granby, CV045000225S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a negligence action against a town and its board of education, the governmental acts and omissions alleged by plaintiff in the maintenance of a high school gymnasium floor where plaintiff fell were discretionary, and the Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-557n(2)(B) statutory grant of immunity for a discretionary act applied.
|
|||||
| Rudder v. Mamanasco Lake Park Ass'n, (AC 25710),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 21, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly found in favor of defendants as to property owners' allegation that they had obtained title to land via adverse possession under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-575, as the trial court applied the proper standard of care in determining that the owners' use of the disputed land was permissive in nature.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
