 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| 418 Meadow St. Assocs., LLC v. One Solution Servs., LLC, AC 29856,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, October 20, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment for landlord was affirmed because tenant's motion to dismiss was denied solely on ground that tenant lacked standing to challenge landlord's standing, but, on appeal, tenant did not challenge that ruling with case law and analysis. Tenant's brief was completely devoid of any argument addressed to the actual ruling of the trial court.
|
|||||
| Clinch v. Generali-U.S. Branch, SC 18256,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, October 20, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Customer was not entitled to recover against an insurer under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-321 for an assault occurring at the insured's establishment because policies contained exclusion provisions for assault and battery and negligent acts described by customer were tied inextricably by the language of the complaint to assault and battery.
|
|||||
| Diaz v. Pineda, AC 30147,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, October 20, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fanotto v. Inland Wetlands Comm'n of Seymour, SC 18221,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, October 20, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal from decision reversing dismissal of owners' appeal from commission's denial of application for inland wetlands permit was reversed because intermediate appellate court held that record did not contain substantial evidence to support commission's decision and that owners were entitled to approval of their application with conditions.
|
|||||
| Ludemann v. Specialty Nat'l Ins. Co., AC 30156,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, October 20, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Red 11, LLC v. Conservation Comm'n, AC 29092,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, October 20, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Conn. State Emples. Ass'n, SEIU Local 2001, AC 29830,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, October 20, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
