 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| BKM Enters. v. Budget Modular Workstations, Inc., CV054008900S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 21, 2007, Decided , February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Five counts of action by seller of wall system against buyers were stricken; count one failed to allege acceptance of wall system by buyers, and therefore, it lacked essential element of a Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42a-2-709 action for breach of contract for sale of goods, and counts for misrepresentation and civil theft were barred by economic loss rule.
|
|||||
| Conn. Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Daigle, CV054013240S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 21, 2007, Decided , February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurance guarantee association's summary judgment motion was denied as to its declaratory judgment action concerning insurance coverage for an underlying tort action, as a police officer who allegedly took nude photos of female volunteers in the course of sting operations was an insured, and policy exclusions were ambiguous.
|
|||||
| Egner v. N. Stonington Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV054002629S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-8(k), a trial court addressed a landowner's equitable claims challenging a zoning board of appeals' denial of his appeal regarding a cease and desist order prohibiting his use of his residence year-round since a laxity in enforcing the seasonal use restriction was not established nor any other arbitrary enforcement.
|
|||||
| Javier v. City of Hartford, CV065002003S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 21, 2007, Decided , February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was entered in favor of a city in a pedestrian's action for injuries he suffered when he allegedly tripped over a portion of a telephone pole jutting out of a sidewalk; recovery under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 13a-149 was precluded as pedestrian's own testimony showed he was comparatively negligent as he was not watching where he was walking.
|
|||||
| Kozlovich v. Kozlovich, (UMY)FA054003806S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, MIDDLESEX REGIONAL FAMILY TRIAL DOCKET AT MIDDLETOWN, February 21, 2007, Decided , February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A husband was granted both a divorce from his wife and an increase in visitation with his two children where the only individual testifying that an increase in visitation was not in the children's best interest was an expert retained by the wife; all other experts indicated the husband had an appropriate, loving relationship with his children.
|
|||||
| Milne v. Filene's, Inc., CV054018766S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 21, 2007, Decided , February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a former employee failed to exhaust available administrative remedies or obtain a release from the Connecticut commission on human rights and opportunities as required by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-101 prior to filing suit for discrimination against the employer, the court did not have jurisdiction over the Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-60 count.
|
|||||
| Milne v. Filene's, Inc., CV054018766S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 21, 2007, Decided , February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employer's motion to strike was granted as to plaintiff's allegation of intentional infliction of emotional distress, as plaintiff's claims that the employer denied time off to see her doctor and falsely accused her of theft did not amount to conduct that was so outrageous in character as to support the cause of action.
|
|||||
| Montagna v. Montagna, FA054017858S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although wife of 36 years was awarded alimony as a result of her action for divorce, contrary to her request, the marital home was to be sold with the parties sharing equally in any profit, and retirement funds were divided equally between the parties.
|
|||||
| Mossa v. State, CV020077497,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 21, 2007, Decided , February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's motion to set aside the verdict in his civil action against the State of Connecticut was denied; the motion failed to articulate a proper basis for his claim that evidence had been either improperly admitted or disallowed and it also failed to identify the portion(s) of the jury instructions that allegedly deprived him of a fair trial.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
