 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Huggins v. Octagon, LLC, CV020820305S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 23, 2004, Decided , February 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Injured party was awarded economic and noneconomic damages following a default by the owners of a club in the injured party's personal injury action; the injured party failed to show entitlement to future medical expenses and loss of income.
|
|||||
| Jo Ann Banks v. Richard A. Banks, FA020189424S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a divorce action, the wife was awarded spousal support and property after the trial court analyzed the age of the wife, the fact she had no more than a high school education, and the husband's history of depleting marital assets for his own use.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. City of New Haven, CV020282191S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, February 23, 2004, Decided , February 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to strike a mother's personal injury claims arising from a fall on stairs in a school was granted; defendants were entitled to governmental immunity, as the alleged failures to remedy the dangerous condition involved discretionary acts.
|
|||||
| Morse v. Morse, FA030070755,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, February 23, 2004, Decided , February 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A marriage was dissolved on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown. No periodic alimony was awarded, but the husband was ordered to pay to the wife a lump sum alimony award.
|
|||||
| Pavacich v. Genest, CV020467602S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 23, 2004, Decided , February 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owner was entitled to summary judgment in a consultant's action for commissions, alleging he was the "procuring cause" of the property's sale, because the consultant was illegally acting as a broker without a license.
|
|||||
| Univ. of Conn. v. Atl. Coast Conf., X07CV030082695S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT TOLLAND, February 23, 2004, Decided , February 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut superior court had personal and subject matter jurisdiction over a nonresident college in a resident university's and non-resident universities' lawsuit based on claims for violating the constitution of an athletic association.
|
|||||
| Univ. of Conn. v. Atl. Coast Conf., X07CV030082695S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT TOLLAND, February 23, 2004, Decided , February 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An athletic director's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction was denied because he fell within the reach of the state's long-arm statute; plaintiffs' claimed he intentionally sent false written material to a university in Connecticut.
|
|||||
| Univ. of Conn. v. Atl. Coast Conf., X07CV030082695S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT TOLLAND, February 23, 2004, Decided , February 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court lacked personal jurisdiction over officers of an athletic conference because the suit filed by members of a competing athletic conference was considered a suit against the conference itself, which was a foreign unincorporated association.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
