 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| B.K. by W.K. v. Norwalk Bd. of Educ., CV980332503S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 16, 2001, Decided , February 16, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State court lacked jurisdiction to award disabled minor attorney fees and costs as prevailing party under IDEA. School board was entitled to summary judgment on Rehabilitation Act claim as minor had not exhausted administrative remedies.
|
|||||
| Bajarano v. Zoning Bd. of Stamford, CV000176393S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 16, 2001, Decided , February 16, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal of zoning board's grant of special exception was dismissed. As zoning regulations required, board relied on determinations of two experts in historic preservation that structure at issue was a historical building.
|
|||||
| Carbo v. Kalosky, FA0092057S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 16, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In visitation action, motion to dismiss was treated as motion to strike and plaintiffs were allowed to plead over, if possible, consistent with court's decision that plaintiffs specifically allege unfitness or imminent harm to child.
|
|||||
| Gittings v. Gittings, FA990427768,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT NEW HAVEN, February 16, 2001, Decided , February 16, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut family court undertook its own estimate of earning capacity of self-employed blacksmith.
|
|||||
| In re Kristina P., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, February 16, 2001, Decided , February 16, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The parental rights of foster parents over their adopted child were terminated where there was no ongoing parent-child relationship and it was in the foster child's best interests.
|
|||||
| Interface Flooring Sys. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., (X02)CV930151595S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 16, 2001, Decided , February 16, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurer was not liable for pre-tender defense expenses where its contractual duty to defend insured and cover related expenses could not be triggered until insured gave insurer proper notice of the suit to be defended.
|
|||||
| P.G.S. Realty Co. v. Zpp&W Assocs., CV930531233,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 16, 2001, Decided , February 16, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant debtors were compelled, via a charging order, to appear at a judgment debtor examination, where it would be determined whether they possessed sufficient assets with which to satisfy the judgment against them.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
