 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ancona v. Manafort Bros., AC 18372,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 22, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed a finding in favor of defendant where defendant did not file a lawsuit against plaintiff in bad faith or with malice.
|
|||||
| Brown v. Brown, FA 970339840S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 22, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An arrearage was found due and recoverable for a business debt that husband did not pay as was required by the parties separation agreement. Husband was found in contempt of court for failure to pay and a capias was ordered.
|
|||||
| Carlin Contr. Co. v. Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, CV 9900551690,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 22, 2000, Decided , February 22, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The arbitrators' award could not be vacated, because the arbitrators had the authority to decide the case, and plaintiff general contractor failed to establish that the arbitrators had acted in manifest disregard of the law.
|
|||||
| Daleman v. Poland Spring Water Co., CV 990172665S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 22, 2000, Decided , February 22, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Cross claim defendant's motion to strike cross claim plaintiffs' indemnification claim granted because cross claim defendants did not state a legally sufficient cause of action for indemnification.
|
|||||
| In re Ashley A., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 22, 2000, Decided , February 22, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court found that respondent mother who was previously adjudicated of having neglected her children had failed to achieve degree of rehabilitation specified in statutory provision, leading to termination of parental rights.
|
|||||
| In re Michael L., AC 19431,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 22, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Respondent's parental rights were terminated where her continued drug use prevented her rehabilitation within a reasonable time.
|
|||||
| Kelly v. Commissioner of Transp. for State, CV 98411722,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 22, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff failed to allege facts to invoke a duty owed by the State to maintain sidewalk where she tripped; therefore, sovereign immunity applied, and the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear her negligence claim.
|
|||||
| Mazza Consulting Group v. M&O Constr. Co., CV 980163656,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 22, 2000, Decided , February 22, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In action to collect consulting fee, prejudgment remedy of attachment ordered where plaintiff demonstrated it would likely prevail on its claim that it furnished consulting services pursuant to contract with defendant.
|
|||||
| Murphy v. Girouard Assocs., CV 990171693S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 22, 2000, Decided , February 22, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant employer's motion to strike pleadings denied; plaintiff's allegations stated a common law claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress in a non-termination employment context.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
