 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alken-Ziegler, Inc. v. Waterbury Headers Corp., CV000159455,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 20, 2001, Decided , February 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Michigan default judgment was not entitled to full faith and credit in Connecticut where Michigan plaintiff never obtained personal jurisdiction over successor to original debtor. Collateral estoppel did not apply.
|
|||||
| Baranowski v. St. Mary's Hosp., CV980148905,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 20, 2001, Decided , February 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut case law did not recognize claims for loss of parental consortium, nor did it allow recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress on a bystander in medical malpractice cases.
|
|||||
| Becker v. Bridgeport Harbor Master, CV000377220,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 20, 2001, Decided , February 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Harbor master's application for declaratory relief, seeking to scrap plaintiff's vessel and recover costs, was denied. Vessel had been in storage for less than 60 days, and, thus, defendant did not comply with statutory requirements.
|
|||||
| Cardone v. Cardone, CV980265422,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT MERIDEN, February 20, 2001, Decided , February 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant motor company was entitled to summary judgment where there were no facts presented to support plaintiff wife's claim that the vehicle against which she was pinned was negligently parked.
|
|||||
| Danziger v. Conservation Comm'n, CV990337403S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 20, 2001, Decided , February 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Wetlands agency acted within its scope of authority when it adopted regulations which expanded the area around wetlands subject to regulation and added additional definitions to a list of regulated activities.
|
|||||
| Davis v. Town of Westport, (AC 19685),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 20, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Homeowners, who purchased two adjoining beachfront lots and built house straddling lots, were wrongfully assessed taxes based on value of the two individual lots. Town was required to employ same methodology applied to other like properties.
|
|||||
| Gatting v. Ridgefield Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV990337855S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 20, 2001, Decided , February 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Developer was not entitled to variance from zoning regulation because proposed use of subject property was not prohibited by the regulations, no hardship was imposed, and, therefore, zoning board did not have the authority to grant variance.
|
|||||
| Gohel v. Allstate Ins. Co., (AC 19337),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 20, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Six year statute of limitations should have applied to plaintiffs' claims for underinsured motorist benefits. Trial court's judgment reversed.
|
|||||
| Himberg v. Shure Funeral Home, CV990266920,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT MERIDEN, February 20, 2001, Decided , February 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs negligent infliction of emotional distress claim was denied; the court could not conclude that there was no legal duty owed by funeral homes to the relatives of decedents.
|
|||||
| Leahy v. Fine, CV970160419S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 20, 2001, Decided , February 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion for summary judgment on apportionment complaint was denied where court found that genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether owner was settled and released party from damages action arising from motor vehicle accident.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
