 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Mohegan Tribe of Indians of State v. Mohegan Tribe & Nation, (SC 16166),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 20, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: "Mohegan Tribe" was a generic term and not entitled to trademark protection because the term related to a class of people and could be used by any person of Mohegan heritage to identify that particular group of people.
|
|||||
| Multi-Unit Servs. v. Centerbank, CV960334177,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 20, 2001, Decided , February 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's request for leave to file amended answer was granted in plaintiff's action for nonpayment of property management services rendered because plaintiff failed to object to the request within 15 days.
|
|||||
| Nationwide Mut. Ins. v. CNA Ins. Co., CV990360226,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 20, 2001, Decided , February 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Self-serving affidavit submitted by defendants denying anyone had permission to use their vehicle was insufficient evidence to overcome the statutory presumption of agency.
|
|||||
| Nunez v. VPSI, Inc., CV970347902,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 20, 2001, Decided , February 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where there were material questions of fact on the issue of whether a police officer negligently performed ministerial acts, the court could not determine the officer was immune from liability as a matter of law.
|
|||||
| O'Connor v. Crist, CV980145634,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 20, 2001, Decided , February 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: School employees were subject to liability for student's injuries on a playground if plaintiffs could show that student was subject to imminent harm because student was identifiable victim within foreseeable class of victims.
|
|||||
| Pite v. Pite, FA990429262S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, February 20, 2001, Decided , February 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut dentist's transfers of assets to trust were made specifically to avoid wife's claims; antenuptial agreement was invalidated for failure to disclose assets at time of execution.
|
|||||
| Pratt & Whitney/United Techs. v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, CV990498805S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 20, 2001, Decided , February 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The hearing officer properly ruled that defendant employee proved her case of gender discrimination where there was substantial evidence to support the decision that punishment was unevenly applied and the reason was pretextual.
|
|||||
| Rivera v. Commissioner of Correction, (AC 19406),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 20, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed a judgment that denied a habeas corpus petition based upon ineffective counsel and failure to provide an interpreter. There was not evidence that petitioner was extremely emotionally disturbed or could not understand English.
|
|||||
| Robyn v. Palmer-Smith, CV990174453S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 20, 2001, Decided , February 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff sufficiently alleged that parent knew or should have known of her child's dangerous tendencies, and therefore alleged an exception to the general rule that a parent was not liable for the torts of its minor child.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
