|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - April 2, 2002
|
| |
|
| |
Jones v. Warden-Cheshire, CV990431378S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, April 2, 2002, Decided , April 2, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although inmate amended habeas corpus petition to add specific facts, he failed to file it under oath as required by state statute.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Miller v. Millercaruso, FA870327052,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, April 2, 2002, Decided , April 2, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Alimony terminated automatically when husband reached age 60; since wife did not pursue earlier motion or file present motion sooner, she waived her right to argue.
|
|
| |
Mindling v. Mindling, FA980166973,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, April 2, 2002, Decided , April 2, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Ocwen Fed. Bank v. Charles, X06CV990168669S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, April 2, 2002, Decided , April 2, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The property owners' claim improperly mixed equitable and contract claims. There was no support for asserting any dishonest purpose of breach of public policy by the bank. However, several special defenses had a sufficient basis.
|
|
| |
Ridgefield Planning & Zoning Comm'n v. Ridgefield Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV010342219S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, April 2, 2002, Decided , April 2, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: No municipal zoning regulation was to prohibit any family day care or group day care home in residential zone. Zoning board of appeals was given liberal discretion, and its reversal of zoning enforcement officer's refusal to act was upheld.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback