 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kijek v. Westmore Fuel Co., CV040198723,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 22, 2005, Decided , February 22, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The fact that a former employee sought remedies under common law state claims that were not available under 29 U.S.C.S. § 1132(a)(1)(B) of the Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1986 (COBRA) did not deprive the state court of concurrent jurisdiction over the COBRA claim and that claim was not dismissed.
|
|||||
| Laccona v. Mallozzi, CV010186179,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 22, 2005, Decided , February 22, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the alleged property owners made a colorable claim that they had an equitable interest in the subject premises by reason of their paying for construction, paying for the homeowners' insurance, and their receipt of the proceeds of the insurance after the fire, the subcontractor's motion for summary judgment was denied.
|
|||||
| Madero v. People's Bank, X01CV030185488,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, February 22, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Allegations that bank discriminated against plaintiffs based on their Colombian origin and made false statements that they were involved in illegal money transfers stated claims under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-66, for slander per se, for both intentional and emotional distress, and for tortious interference with a business expectation.
|
|||||
| Mozell v. Comm'r of Corr., (AC 24428),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 22, 2005, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Tactical decision made by petitioner's appellate counsel not to pursue issues on appeal, including the trial court's admission of evidence that a coconspirator possessed a gun, and denial of a motion to sever, fell within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance. The habeas court properly dismissed his habeas corpus petition.
|
|||||
| Mucci Constr., LLC v. Planning Comm'n, CV030403940,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 22, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Developers' motion to open and said aside a judgment dismissing their appeal from an order denying them a waiver of an underground utilities requirement was denied as said requirement was mandatory, the regulation had always been enforced, no practical difficulty existed in said denial, and the developers had the opportunity to address estoppel.
|
|||||
| Patel v. Singh, CV030406858S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 22, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' motion to strike was denied as to CUTPA claims as the owners' allegations that defendants converted lease payments and a lease on property stated a sufficient CUTPA claim, but the motion to strike was granted as to fraud claims as the owner failed to state with specificity any fraudulent acts by defendants.
|
|||||
| Pietruszka v. Machado, CV020099809,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 22, 2005, Decided , February 22, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A cross complaint asserting indemnification against two real estate agents was stricken upon the agents' motion because the cross complaint failed to alleged indemnification arising out of a contract and failed to show that completion of certain real estate disclosure forms was within the agents' exclusive control.
|
|||||
| Pitts v. DeCosta, (AC 24862),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 22, 2005, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to amend a negligence complaint to add a statutory strict liability claim was properly denied because the motion was made after the close of all evidence and because it was unclear whether the statute would even apply, an issue that necessitated additional evidence and research.
|
|||||
| Rattet, Pasternak & Oliver, LLP v. Licata, CV040200556,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 22, 2005, Decided , February 22, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A New York default judgment was entitled to full faith and credit and a law firm's motion for summary judgment was granted since a former client did not file a counter affidavit asserting that the New York judgment was void for a reason such as lack of jurisdiction; rather the former client alleged facts that should have been presented in New York.
|
|||||
| Sadler-Levy v. Levy, FA030481454S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 22, 2005, Decided , February 22, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Physical custody of a 10-year-old daughter was awarded to a mother in a dissolution proceeding because it was in the best interest of the girl to reside with her mother and the father was granted more visitation than the guidelines provided to coincide with the mother's work schedule.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
