 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Havens v. Collard, HHBCV044003510S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court, pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 17-49, granted summary judgment to driver and driver's employer on claimant's action against them involving their tractor-trailer striking claimant's tractor-trailer in a multi-vehicle accident; claimant did not rebut driver's contention that driver's vehicle was completely stopped before the accident.
|
|||||
| Meseha v. Meseha, FA040129957S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, February 23, 2006, Decided , February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a marriage dissolution action, the parties' testimony and evidence at a hearing, as well as the factors in Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿¿ 46b-62, 46b-81, 46b-82 and other statutes, led to the conclusion that the marriage had broken down irretrievably. The evidence indicated that the parties had lived separate and apart for approximately nine years.
|
|||||
| State v. Ortiz, CR98177721,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 23, 2006, Decided , February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant's alleged behavior violated the felony murder statute, his claim could not be properly addressed by way of a motion to correct an illegal sentence under Conn. Gen. Practice Book, R. Super Ct. ¿ 43-22; the trial court complied with the requirements of Conn. Gen. Practice Book, R. Super Ct. ¿ 39-21 in sentencing him.
|
|||||
| State v. Sherwood, CR8523240,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the committee was working and fully committed to his comprehensive outpatient treatment program, he did not require any psychiatric medications, and all treatment providers concluded that he could be safely discharged, the application for discharge from the Psychiatric Security Review Board was granted pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 17a-593.
|
|||||
| Yale v. Health Net of Conn., Inc., X01CV054005900S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, February 23, 2006, Decided , February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to join professional association as defendant in action against health insurance provider alleging discriminatory reimbursement of podiatrists was denied. Joinder would force plaintiffs to sue party they did not wish to sue, provider would not be prejudiced by denial of joinder, and adequate remedy could obtained without joinder.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
