Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Connecticut - February 24, 2004

  
State v. Rosario, (AC 22379), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 24, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's conviction of evasion of responsibility in the operation of a motor vehicle was affirmed; the relevant statute did not allow defendant to leave the scene of an accident and report the accident to police at a later time.

Search Cases for Free

  
Stutz v. Shepard, CV010388156, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 24, 2004, Decided , February 24, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: As there was no basis articulated for an admittedly subjective fee award of $ 50,000, one-third of the "lodestar" amount submitted by a shareholder, part of an arbitration award was remanded for articulation.

Search Cases for Free

  
Szczapa v. UPS, Inc., (SC 16942), SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 24, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Valencia v. Crabtree Imps., Inc., X04CV020103613S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, February 24, 2004, Decided , February 24, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: While manufacturer's sticker on vehicle was not a dealer's advertisement, under unfair trade practices statute, consumer could try to show practice of selling vehicles for amount higher than that on sticker, without notice, was unfair trade practice.

Search Cases for Free

  
Verspyck v. Franco, (AC 23813), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 24, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in entering judgment for property owners in an action alleging vexatious litigation; a trust beneficiary, in an underlying action challenging a conveyance of property from a trust, was entitled to an advice of counsel defense.

Search Cases for Free

  
Vines v. Warden, CV010003438, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 19 AT ROCKVILLE, February 24, 2004, Decided , February 24, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Petition for a writ of habeas corpus was denied because the assignment of a prisoner, following a hearing, to administrative segregation did not create any violation of due process rights that the court could vindicate.

Search Cases for Free

  
White v. Beedle, CV030127613, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, February 24, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where purchaser asserted in his motion to open judgment that he failed to appear due to family tragedies that occurred prior to court date at issue, motion was too vague and failed to particularly set forth reason for failure to appear.

Search Cases for Free

  
Wong v. Wong, FA020192723S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 24, 2004, Decided , February 24, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court entered judgment dissolving a marriage on the ground that the marriage was irretrievably broken down, and awarded joint custody of the parties' children, alimony, child support, and distributed the parties' assets and liabilities.

Search Cases for Free

  
Wong v. Wong, FA020192723S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 24, 2004, Decided , February 24, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A wife was in contempt of automatic property orders in a dissolution action by spending joint funds for her personal use, but since the contempt was factored into the allocation of the parties' property, no penalties were imposed.

Search Cases for Free

  
Wyatt Energy, Inc. v. Motiva Enters., LLC, (AC 23740), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 24, 2004, Officially Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a judge ruled that an energy company's antitrust illegality defense was insufficient as a matter of law and another judge granted a prejudgment remedy on a different ground, the appeal was dismissed, as no practical relief was available.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top