 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Muldoon v. Anderson, CV990336964S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 24, 2003, Decided , February 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Letters accusing students of cheating, signed by fellow students, were privileged, as they were made in accordance with policies in the university student handbook, which said members of the university community had a right to allege misconduct.
|
|||||
| Panebianco v. Borea, CV020817297S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 24, 2003, Decided , February 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The hardship of needing to have the mother-in-law move onto the property due to health reasons did not relate to the parcel. Rather, it related to the personal circumstances of the family which was not a proper basis for granting a variance.
|
|||||
| State v. Silano, CR020180647,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 2 AT BRIDGEPORT, February 24, 2003, Decided , February 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the State did not prove that the value of a fence exceeded $ 1,000, defendant could not be convicted of grand larceny; the evidence supported defendant's convictions for trespass, disorderly conduct, and interfering with an officer.
|
|||||
| Swetzes v. Burk, CV020820462S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 24, 2003, Decided , February 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While the injured party could seek double or treble damages from the driver, the family car vicarious liability statute did not impose vicarious liability for statutory double and treble damages upon the non-operator owners of family cars.
|
|||||
| United States v. Carpenter, CV020067463,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, February 24, 2003, Decided , February 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defenses to a foreclosure action were limited to payment, discharge, release or satisfaction, or that there had never been a valid lien. Homeowner's defenses in a foreclosure action were without merit, and summary judgment was granted.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
