 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Sheri B., W10CP01013820A,W10CP01013821A, W10CP01013822A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, February 25, 2004, Decided , February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Given father's criminal record, the fact he consented to transfer of custody and guardianship to woman described as his long-time girlfriend, and the absence of the mother of the three children in their lives, the motion to transfer was granted.
|
|||||
| Jackson v. New London County Mut. Ins. Co., CV010809604,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the weight of authority supported a police officer's position and the attempt to allocate any payment for future economic damages from a stipulation would be purely speculative, the insurer's motion for remittitur was denied.
|
|||||
| McKnerney v. Beebe, 563040,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 25, 2004, Decided , February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because there was no genuine question that co-owners of a cottage were not the keepers of a dog that was owned by other owners of the cottage, the co-owners were entitled to summary judgment on injury claims against them as the dog's keepers.
|
|||||
| Phillips v. Phillips, CV030070077,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, February 25, 2004, Decided , February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grandfather did not prove that he was entitled to a homestead exemption against granddaughter's action to foreclose her judgment lien against certain property, as the evidence showed the property was not the grandfather's primary residence.
|
|||||
| Ranta v. Ranta, FA980195304S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The wife was ordered, inter alia, to stop using her laptop computer and to turn it over to the court clerk; the husband was ordered to replace the computer.
|
|||||
| Rice v. Monteleone, FA020563144S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A wife was not entitled to an annulment under New York law based upon her assertion that her husband had fraudulently induced her into marriage six years earlier in order to be supported financially by her successful career as a fiction writer.
|
|||||
| Stanwich v. Stanwich, FA970156591S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mother's motion for sole custody of the parties' children was granted, as the father continued to obstruct mental health treatments for his children and failed to learn techniques for diffusing his son's aggressive and violent behaviors.
|
|||||
| State v. Ancona, CR96874650,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although defendant went to great lengths not to endanger his tenants when he set fire to four buildings, he did little to ensure the safety of the firefighters; therefore, the 21-year sentence was neither inappropriate nor disproportionate.
|
|||||
| State v. Bacon, CR01156717,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant had a history of sexually assaulting minors, a total effective sentence of eight years followed by 20 years of probation was neither inappropriate nor disproportionate.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
