 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Soteriou v. Soteriou, FA030733243S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 23, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Stevenson Lumber Co. - Suffield, Inc. v. Chase Assocs., CV020815008S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 23, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Upon reargument, court vacated award of summary judgment in favor of a corporation on a lumber company's RICO claim because although no courts appeared to have expressly allowed individuals to predicate civil RICO claims on bank fraud through 18 U.S.C.S. ¿ 1344, they had in fact reargued that such claims were proper by hearing them on their merits.
|
|||||
| Sweeney v. Sweeney, FA960080078S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 23, 2005, Decided , February 23, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Considering factors set forth in Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿¿ 46b-82, 46b-86, even though the former husband had retired, so that there were changed circumstances, the husband still had an earning capacity and based upon the differences in lifestyle, the husband would still be obligated to the former wife for alimony of $100 per month.
|
|||||
| Town of E. Hartford v. E. Hartford Police Officers' Ass'n, CV044005647S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, February 23, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A motion for a temporary injunction was denied in an arbitration dispute because a collective bargaining agreement did not specifically cover the time limitation for requesting arbitration in a situation where a meeting with a personnel director was delayed; a union's filing several weeks after a failure to render a decision was reasonable.
|
|||||
| Weinberg v. Norwest Bank Minn., N.A., CV010559220,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 23, 2005, Decided , February 23, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
