 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Boykin, CR99148692,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant had assaulted and attempted to kill two women in a 10-year time period, a 30-year sentence for attempted murder and sexual assault was neither inappropriate nor disproportionate.
|
|||||
| State v. Christian, MV0291538,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant had a history of drunk driving, a total effective sentence of 10 years suspended after eight years seven months' incarceration and five years probation was not inappropriate.
|
|||||
| State v. Estrada, CR99483659,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although petitioner's criminal history was egregious, his net sentence of 40 years for one incident relating to the sale of narcotics was disproportionate considering the relevant factors; thus, his sentence was modified to a net of 15 years.
|
|||||
| State v. Jarecke, CR98110843,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because of the violent nature of a kidnapping committed with a handgun and defendant's criminal history, sentence of 18 years' incarceration suspended after 12 years with five years of probation was neither inappropriate nor disproportionate.
|
|||||
| State v. Kozak, CR97143012,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was a career criminal and on lifetime parole, the sentencing court had to decide that a severe sentence was warranted at some point; the sentence was in accordance with the Connecticut Practice Book and was not disproportionate.
|
|||||
| Statewide Griev. Comm. v. Gifford, CV030826891,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an attorney failed to adequately communicate with his clients, failed to reasonably inform his clients about the status of their cases, showed no remorse, and had already been suspended for the same conduct, he was suspended for three years.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. Comm'r of Revenue Servs., File No. CV-03 0520598S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 25, 2004, Decided , February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where statute regarding notice of tax jeopardy assessments allowed personal service or service by regular mail, service by certified mail was personal service, and the time for filing a petition for reassessment ran from the date notice was received.
|
|||||
| Vertex, Inc. v. City of Waterbury, CV020515359S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The contractor was allowed to try and prove at trial that it entered into a subsequent oral agreement with the city with a new consideration, separate and distinct from the original written agreement.
|
|||||
| Weiner-Marcus v. Goldring Home Inspections, Inc., CV03082901,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 25, 2004, Decided , February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the buyer had not satisfied the statutory and Connecticut General Practice Book requirements for opening a nonsuit, the court had no authority to do so.
|
|||||
| Wenzel v. Wenzel, FA030480309S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 25, 2004, Decided , February 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the primary cause of the breakdown of the marriage was the behavior of the husband, the marriage was dissolved; the husband was to pay alimony, unpaid taxes, and one-half of the parties' health care obligations.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
