 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Birdsell v. Lombarty, 062035,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, February 22, 2001, Decided , February 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiffs and defendant each owned undivided one-half interest in property, and plaintiffs wished to sell property, plaintiffs' requested distribution of proceeds, which differed from parties' ownership interests, was not approved.
|
|||||
| Cheryl Terry Enters. v. City of Hartford, CV980547097S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 22, 2001, Decided , February 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a competitive bid case, the party not awarded the bid could not sue for damages based upon a violation of the Connecticut Antitrust Act. The party could only seek injunctive relief.
|
|||||
| Cheryl Terry Enters. v. City of Hartford, 547097,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 22, 2001, Decided , February 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In action involving a bid for a contract to transport school children, court found that bus company was a necessary party and should be joined by the defendant to this action for injunctive relief within 30 days.
|
|||||
| Jastroch v. Haynes, CV99367167S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 22, 2001, Decided , February 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiff failed to serve defendant within the statutory period, the complaint was untimely the court dismissed it on summary judgment.
|
|||||
| Lay v. Randall, CV000083991,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, February 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lynch v. Stosuy, CV0074025S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 22, 2001, Decided , February 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statutory municipal immunity protected town from tort action arising from one of its employee's use of a gun during a mock disaster exercise where the employee fired blanks at the plaintiff.
|
|||||
| Office of Consumer Counsel v. Connecticut Dep't of Pub. Util. Control, CV990498853,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court dismissed state consumer office appeal of utility commission decision setting utility's standard offer under cost restructuring statute. Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction as administrative remedies were not exhausted.
|
|||||
| Paul v. Paul, FA000177216S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rivera v. Mozzicato, CV990591615S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 22, 2001, Decided , February 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Tenant's recovery for landlords' failure to clear ice and snow from entry stairs, resulting in tenant's fall and injuries, was reduced by the percentage of her comparative negligence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
