|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 25, 2003
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Bruno v. BBC Corp., CV00071634S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 25, 2003, Decided , February 25, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Drouin v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n, 552981,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 25, 2003, Decided , February 25, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A planning and zoning commission had substantial evidence on which to deny an application for site plan approval where the proposed plan constituted an expansion from the original site plan and required a special use permit modification application.
|
|
| |
First Union Cmty. Reinvestment Account Mortg. Loan Trust v. Nelson, CV00443981S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 25, 2003, Decided , February 25, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Mortgagee's motion to strike was denied, as the allegations of the mortgagor's counterclaim regarding a CUTPA violation, if proven, would be a defense to the mortgagee's foreclosure action since she charged that the mortgagee caused the default.
|
|
| |
Foster v. Longa, CV990425745S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 25, 2003, Decided , February 25, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although Connecticut law recognized a custom, in tort litigation, of keeping settlement offers open unless explicitly withdrawn, that usage could not establish that the parties ever actually had an enforceable agreement.
|
|
| |
In re Jane Doe, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 25, 2003, Decided , February 25, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a child's parents could not provide the specialized care that the child's physical health required, resulting in a serious, unexplained injury, the child could be adjudicated to have been uncared for.
|
|
| |
Lmk Enters. v. Sun Oil Co., CV020463366,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 25, 2003, Decided , February 25, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: That lessee's answers to interrogatories may have erroneously assessed amount of damages to leasehold did not mean that there were no damages; amount of damages was an issue of material fact that precluded granting summary judgment to lessor.
|
|
| |
Macdonald v. Town of Waterford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 561714,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 25, 2003, Decided , February 25, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Zoning enforcement officer exceeded his authority when he allowed the construction of the new nonconforming structure on subject property since the nonconforming use was limited to expansion, modification, or alteration of the existing structure.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback