|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - July 17, 2008
|
| |
Dixon v. Dixon, FA970717086,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD AT HARTFORD, July 17, 2008, Decided, July 17, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Father proved substantial change in financial circumstances sufficient to warrant modification of alimony and child support under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-86 where he established an almost 50% reduction in his income, a $99,285 decrease in his assets, and mother's income had increased and her assets had increased by $1,435,234.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Goodrich Pump & Engine Controls, Inc. v. Turbine Controls, Inc., CV075008001,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD AT HARTFORD, July 17, 2008, Decided, July 17, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because the three-year statute of limitations in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110g(f) had expired, and because there was no continuing course of conduct that would have tolled the statute of limitations, the company's motion to strike a Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act claim was properly denied and its ensuing motion to reargue was also denied.
|
|
| |
Hill v. Hill, FA074028657,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD AT HARTFORD, July 17, 2008, Decided, July 17, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Regarding relocation of mother from Connecticut to New Jersey, court concluded that it would be in minor child's best interests to remain in Connecticut and live in close proximity to both parents. Parties were to have joint legal custody with primary residence of child with mother. Father was to have reasonable and liberal visitation with child.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Mun v. Doria, FSTCV044001719S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, July 17, 2008, Decided, July 17, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Plaintiff was awarded $ 65,000.00 attorneys fee in foreclosure case as plaintiff's counsel was experienced and capable, and attested to reasonableness of work done and fees charged. Without criticizing plaintiff's counsel, less fees than were provided for in parties' agreement were awarded under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 49-7.
|
|
| |
Pafka v. Gibson, X03CV055008249S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT HARTFORD, July 17, 2008, Decided, July 17, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Since to foreclose a patient who made an inquiry during the 90-day period from filing a claim based upon lack of informed consent rather than medical negligence after conducting the inquiry, would contradict the whole purpose of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-190a(b), a doctor and doctors' group were not entitled to summary judgment.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
