 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Carter, CR98273636, MV351770,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION AT WATERBURY, February 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed the prison sentence of a driver who, through thoughtless and irresponsible conduct, ended up taking a life of another with his motor vehicle. The driver had no insurance and a suspended license.
|
|||||
| State v. Vega, CR94103011,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Vestuti v. Abercrombie, Burns, McKiernan & Co. Ins., Inc., CV950378383S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT NEW HAVEN, February 22, 2001, Decided , February 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee could not sue insurance agency for not properly notifying state agency and carrier that employee was included on employer's workers' compensation policy because the carrier acceded to the coverage and settled with employee for injury.
|
|||||
| Yaglenski v. CPM Ins. Servs., CV960323208S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 22, 2001, Decided , February 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insured's breach of contract claim against insurance agency failed because only contract established was insurance policy, which was fully performed. Plaintiff failed to establish fiduciary relationship or standard of care owed by agency.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
