|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 25, 2003
|
| |
Maslansky v. First Assembly of God, CV010343545S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 25, 2003, Decided , February 25, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A motion to strike by the employer of an injured employee as to a church's first count in a counterclaim for indemnification relating to the injured employee's action was granted; the count alleged only passive and secondary negligence.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Prod. Res. Group v. Distributed Media Corp., X06CV010170391S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, February 25, 2003, Decided , February 25, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: An individual's motion to strike claims alleging CUTPA violations and fraud was denied; a company alleged a pattern of misrepresentation that induced the company to further contract with corporate defendants and delay litigation.
|
|
| |
Prucinsky v. Evans, File No. CV01-0386098S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 25, 2003, Decided , February 25, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Dog walker who merely took dog for a walk in the park for his aunt, who was caring for dog while its owner was incarcerated, was not "keeper" of dog, and thus, not liable to injured party for injuries sustained when dog attacked the injured party.
|
|
| |
State v. Allie, CR020116585S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 25, 2003, Decided , February 25, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant was precluded from the use of the accelerated rehabilitation program after an eligibility check found that defendant had a conviction in New York for disorderly conduct, a violation which carried a possible penalty of 15 days imprisonment.
|
|
| |
State v. Barnett, MV97279481, MV97278969, MV97280781, CR99112217, CR99112853, CR99113360, CR99113421, CR00114623, CR00114733, CR00115952, CR00115678, CR00115695,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 13 AT ENFIELD, February 25, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a sentencing court's actions accorded with the parameters of the Connecticut practice book and there was no agreement as to the extent of defendant's sentence, a five-year sentence out of a possible exposure of 15 years was acceptable.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback