|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - July 17, 2008
|
| |
Rodriquez v. Norniella, CVX06065005437S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, July 17, 2008, Decided, July 17, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motion to strike count of complaint asserting claims against a mental health clinic for violation of Mental Health Patient's Bill of Rights was denied because claims for violations of Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 17a-542 did not require allegations of wanton, reckless or malicious conduct, or for that matter, negligence.
|
|
| |
United States Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Garces, CV075004536,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON AT NEW LONDON, July 17, 2008, Decided, July 17, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Mortgagor could assert recognized equitable defenses to mortgage foreclosure, including inter alia, misrepresentation, fraudulent inducement, and equitable estoppel, against assignee of a note and mortgage as assignee stood in shoes of assignor loan originator and the defenses addressed the making and validity of the note and mortgage.
|
|
| |
United States Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Reynoso, CV075004312,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON AT NEW LONDON, July 17, 2008, Decided, July 17, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Mortgagors could assert recognized equitable defenses to mortgage foreclosure, including inter alia, misrepresentation, fraudulent inducement, and equitable estoppel, against assignee of a note and mortgage as assignee stood in shoes of assignor loan originator and the defenses addressed the making and validity of the note and mortgage.
|
|
| |
Watts v. Employee's Review Bd., HHBCV074013095S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, July 17, 2008, Decided, July 17, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: State agency properly fired employee for just cause under Conn. Gen. Stat. ?5-240 for misuse of state time in violation of Conn. Agencies Regs. ? 5-240-1a(7) (1988) and violation of agency policy concerning neglect of duty, as missing 13 work days for unapproved reasons was reasonable cause for termination and was not arbitrary action by agency.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback