|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 26, 2007
|
| |
Adams v. State, HHBCV064011617,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Teacher's appeal was dismissed as substantial evidence supported hearing officer's finding that teacher committed sexual abuse under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-101g(b) as student disclosed incident consistently to mother, police, principal, and investigator, fellow student supported student's version, and teacher gave contradictory statements.
|
|
| |
Barcello v. WCL Mgmt., LLC, CV065000632S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 26, 2007, Decided , February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because a plaintiff's claim for the jury docket was not filed within the time limits set out in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-215, because the parties had not requested a jury trial in writing, and because there were no extenuating circumstances to justify an exception to the rules, the claim was struck.
|
|
| |
Condon v. Condon, DBDFA064005561S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 26, 2007, Decided , February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Father was found in willful contempt of prior court order directing him to pay mother $3,100 per week in unallocated child support and alimony because even with an economic slow-down in the residential construction industry, the father's imputed annual income was $250,000 and he directed available funds to purposes other than his legal obligations.
|
|
| |
Dolphin v. Warden, State Prison, TSRCV054000537S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 26, 2007, Decided , February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Petition for writ of habeas corpus was denied as trial court had personal and subject matter jurisdiction. Even if first arrest warrant was invalid, inmate's conviction for probation violation was based solely on testimony as to inmate's failure to comply with sex offender treatment and to register as sex offender.
|
|
| |
In re Francesa L., CP06010033A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, JUVENILE MATTERS AT MIDDLETOWN, February 26, 2007, Decided , February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because a mother had not demonstrated that the reasons for a Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-129(b) order of temporary custody (OTC) had abated, the Department of Children and Families' motion for a directed verdict was granted, and the mother's motion to revoke the OTC was denied.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Valentin, UWYCR04328520,,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 26, 2007, Decided , February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant was not guilty under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-180b as first statement to police reported only that his military wife might be dead and second false statement that she was dead was not gratuitous; defendant was guilty under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-157b as second statement was given on form that warned false statements were punishable.
|
|
| |
Trumbull Shopping Ctr. 32, LLC v. Benni's III, LLC, BRSP061813,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, HOUSING SESSION, February 26, 2007, Decided , February 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A landlord was entitled to immediate possession of leased premises being operated as a restaurant because the tenant had failed to comply with a stipulated judgment requiring it to repair a water leak, even after being given an extension, and the tenant had lost its sales and use tax permit based on non-payment of taxes.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|