 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Citizens for the Preservation of Woodbury v. Woodbury Zoning Comm'n, CV 990156349,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, May 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs were without standing to pursue appeal because they were not statutorily aggrieved by defendant commission's decision to rezone land because their property was not within 100 feet of rezoned property.
|
|||||
| Coryell v. Coryell, 0551205,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, May 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court granted dissolution of marriage sought by plaintiff woman; finding both parties had stable employment and were well educated, periodic alimony was not granted to either party.
|
|||||
| Delmoral v. Tilcon State, CV 990155116,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, May 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a personal injury action stemming from an automobile accident, defendant's motion to strike public nuisance allegations in plaintiffs' complaint was granted because the complaint did not allege a continuing danger.
|
|||||
| F.N. Builders, Inc. v. Yellen, CV 000595749S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, May 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court had jurisdiction over the negligence, tortious interference with a business relationship, and misuse of process actions because the actions brought issues which were not litigated in a different action between the same parties.
|
|||||
| Guarini v. Guarini, FA 990150377S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, May 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court granted plaintiff wife's petition for dissolution of marriage because defendant's failure to apply for government assistance to pay his medical bills irretrievably broke down the marriage.
|
|||||
| Marcus v. Pascoe, CV 940532892S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, May 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut statute that permitted re-filing of actions that failed earlier through inadvertence, mistake, or inexcusable neglect did not reach plaintiff whose action was dismissed when he refused to proceed to trial.
|
|||||
| Millbrook Owner's Ass'n v. State Dep't of Envtl. Protection, CV 990498808S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, May 12, 2000, Decided , May 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to dismiss was granted since Commissioner of the State of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection's revocation order was not final decision in contested case, and thus court lacked jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Monroe v. Monroe, FA 980166302S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, May 12, 2000, Decided , May 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court determined that marriage of plaintiff wife and defendant husband had irretrievably broken down, and entered judgment dissolving marriage on that ground, and entered orders for alimony and child support.
|
|||||
| Morin v. Troymac'S, Inc., CV 990171575S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, May 12, 2000, Decided , May 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff, who choked on burnt cheeseburger, failed to alleged sufficient facts to support his reckless products liability claim where he failed to show that restaurant had knowledge of a substantial risk and disregarded it.
|
|||||
| Nicholas B., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, May 12, 2000, Decided , May 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parental rights of mother and father as to their son, age three, were terminated where son was born testing positive for drugs, parents continued to be arrested and use drugs, and parents failed to maintain contact with child.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
