|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 26, 2003
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Alcoa Composites v. Bonded Tech., CV000093208S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 26, 2003, Decided , February 26, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where plaintiff obtained a default judgment against defendants, plaintiff was not entitled to greater damages than plaintiff demanded in its complaint. Therefore, plaintiff was limited to the prayer for relief contained in the complaint.
|
|
| |
Bolles v. Bolles, FA020561738S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 26, 2003, Decided , February 26, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Brown v. State, CV000095394,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 26, 2003, Decided , February 26, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and of mental incapacity at the time of plea could have been pursued in a habeas corpus proceeding, so coram nobis was unavailable.
|
|
| |
Bunch v. Warden, CV990003066,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 19 AT ROCKVILLE, February 26, 2003, Decided , February 26, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Petitioner was not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus where he voluntarily pled guilty to underlying criminal charges, as he could not show that absent his counsel's errors he would have insisted on going to trial or that he was prejudiced.
|
|
| |
Carpender v. Sigel, FA000338366S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 26, 2003, Decided , February 26, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a trial court's original child support order substantially deviated from the guidelines, and the court made a specific finding of inequity or inappropriateness, the order could not be modified due to a subsequent deviation.
|
|
| |
|
| |
City of New Haven v. Madina, CV990429230,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 26, 2003, Decided , February 26, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A city properly determined the value of property that was condemned; the property owners' appraisal of the property did not utilize proper comparable sales and did not account for extensive damage to the property in question.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback