Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Connecticut - February 27, 2004

  
Anderson v. Meinking, CV020126330S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, February 27, 2004, Decided , February 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A motion to vacate an order reopening a foreclosure judgment was granted where the creditor and the sale committee showed they had no notice of the motion by a debtor, and thus, no opportunity to be heard on the matter.

Search Cases for Free

  
Bennett v. Nixon, FA030484745S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 27, 2004, Decided , February 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court had jurisdiction to hear a putative father's application for visitation of a child; the father's pleading established a parent-like relationship with the child and that serious harm could occur if visitation was denied.

Search Cases for Free

  
Bourne v. Seiki, CV010382738, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 27, 2004, Decided , February 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: There were no genuine issues of material fact that a manufacturer's subsidiary parted with possession and control of a lathe more than 10 years before an injured party commenced a products liability suit; the statute of repose barred the action.

Search Cases for Free

  
City of Meriden v. Town of Berlin, File No. CV-00 0501619S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 27, 2004, Decided , February 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: City's claim of a property exemption for 22 parcels of watershed property located in a neighboring town failed because the town's residents did not use the water and were not entitled to use it on the same basis as the city's residents.

Search Cases for Free

  
Embalmer's Supply Co. v. Giannitti, 010183763S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 27, 2004, Decided , February 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Genuine issue of material fact existed about whether company's general release of company shareholder in a lawsuit company brought against him also released the law firm, and, thus, the law firm's amended motion for summary judgment was denied.

Search Cases for Free

  
Fasig v. Fasig, FA030348592, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 27, 2004, Decided , February 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In the wife's dissolution proceeding seeking joint custody of two children, the court granted the husband sole custody and severely limited the mother's visitation where it found the mother was emotionally abusive to the parties' oldest child.

Search Cases for Free

  
Hastings v. Ground Round, Inc., CV010456864, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Hirsch v. Ginise, CV030194598, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 27, 2004, Decided , February 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A trial court granted an executor's motion to strike a CUTPA claim by a beneficiary of a will because the administrator was not engaged in trade or commerce within the meaning of CUTPA while performing his duties as executor.

Search Cases for Free

  
Keohane v. Crossroads Dev. Co., CV030475044S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: An employer's motion to intervene in employees' personal injury action was denied where the motion to intervene was not filed within 30 days as statutorily required; the statutory notice was sufficient.

Search Cases for Free

  
Marco v. Club Liquid, CV030195504, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 27, 2004, Decided , February 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Nightclub's motion to dismiss condominium owner's original complaint alleging it and others were liable for excess noise and smoke entering her condominium was dismissed, as she had filed amended pleading that did not name it as a defendant.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top