 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Asmus Elec. Inc. v. G.M.K. Contrs., LLC, CV 040489527,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 25, 2005, Decided , February 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Business owner with claims against a contractor for failing to complete work lacked standing to bring bad faith failure to settle claims against the contractor's insurer under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 42-110b(a), and the Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 38-816(6).
|
|||||
| Bottiglieri v. Sit On It Seating, CV040085213S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the injured party's Connecticut Products Liability Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 52-572m et seq., claim arose solely from the repair service's repair of the product and not from a sale of the product, the repair service was entitled to summary judgment, as the provision of services did not fall under the Act.
|
|||||
| Comer v. Paredes, CV030564543,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 25, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Co-conservator adequately alleged in count one of his complaint that the conservator converted the ward's assets and adequately alleged in count two that the conservator's conduct towards the ward breached a fiduciary duty, and, thus, the conservator's motion to strike, filed pursuant to Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. ¿ 10-39, was denied.
|
|||||
| Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, FA040129422,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, February 25, 2005, Decided , February 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inasmuch as an ex-husband obligor continued to reside in the issuing state of Massachusetts, the Connecticut court was without power to modify the Massachusetts child support order and Massachusetts continued to have jurisdiction over that order. Thus, the motion to increase child support was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Gager v. Sanger, (X02)CV030182451S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, February 25, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because there was no support for extending the statute of limitations based on equity and the ex-husband could not allege equitable estoppel or that the ex-wife impeded his ability to file his lawsuit, the breach of contract suit was barred by any statute of limitations, including Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 52-576.
|
|||||
| Haltzer v. H.P. Latham, Inc., CV044000350,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 25, 2005, Decided , February 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where moving company filed apportionment complaint against Delaware driver of vehicle into which moving company's vehicle crashed in New Jersey, personal jurisdiction under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 52-59b long-arm statute was not established. Damage occurred in New Jersey, and there was no evidence of contacts under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 52-59b(a)(3)(B).
|
|||||
| In re Anthony M., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, JUVENILE MATTERS AT NEW HAVEN, February 25, 2005, Decided , February 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court granted mother's motion to transfer her son's guardianship to her because evidence, including consensus opinions of experts and others was, that mother lived with husband and their son and had suitable living and other arrangements for son, stayed in touch, and achieved personal rehabilitation to be constructive parent.
|
|||||
| Jacob v. Polvani, CV020280039S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, February 25, 2005, Decided , February 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a negligence and recklessness action, defendant's motion for discovery was denied in order to protect plaintiff's privilege with her social worker under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿¿52-146q(c)(4). Moreover, a second IME was not ordered, but a future motion was not precluded in order to update new medical records concerning plaintiff's recent surgery.
|
|||||
| Keegan v. Keegan, FA040129193S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, February 25, 2005, Decided , February 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As part of a divorce settlement, a wife was ordered to pay her husband for a portion of the equity in the marital home, which had been extensively renovated through the use of money provided by the husband's mother.
|
|||||
| Kosek v. Osman, FA02-04665181,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where, after parties' religious wedding ceremony, plaintiff reasonably believed she was married to defendant and they began living together as husband and wife and held themselves out to others as being married, their lack of formal compliance with the statutory requirements pertaining to marriage licenses did not void their marriage.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
