 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Heritage Benefit Consultants, Inc. v. Cole, CV00162270S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 23, 2001, Decided , February 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a company materially breached an employment agreement by failing to deliver stock promised under the agreement, an employee was not bound by a non-compete clause in the agreement.
|
|||||
| McNerney v. Carvel, CV00579244,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 23, 2001, Decided , February 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former franchisees did not meet the adequacy, commonality, and superiority requirements in their motion for class certification.
|
|||||
| Olexovitch v. Carralero, FA95323314S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court found the mother in contempt for interfering with the father's visitation and ordered a hearing to mandate future visits with the father and therapy sessions. Remedial or coercive measures were more appropriate than commitment.
|
|||||
| Peterken v. Wetlands Comm'n, CV990090555S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 23, 2001, Decided , February 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Wetlands commission properly approved the construction of a driveway over a wetland; the application contained sufficient information upon which commission could base its determination, including a site plan and engineering maps.
|
|||||
| Robinson v. Gwozdz, FA950619118,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, FAMILY SUPPORT MAGISTRATE AT HARTFORD, February 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court denied reargument of its decision finding respondent in contempt of court for failure to pay child support order. The medical evidence submitted did not support respondent's claimed disability.
|
|||||
| Rotondi v. Rotondi, FA00000377065,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where wife moved for change in unallocated child support and maintenance based on injury, allegedly caused by husband, that occurred prior to court's original order, and she had not previously informed court about injury, motion was denied.
|
|||||
| Russo v. Danziger Homes, CV990336316S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 23, 2001, Decided , February 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court denied a general contractor's motion to dismiss an unfair trade practice act claim for defective septic system installation. The act permitted claims for single incidents and claims for work of subcontractors.
|
|||||
| Union Carbide Corp. v. City of Danbury, CV000339372S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 23, 2001, Decided , February 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In using income capitalization approach to valuation, city properly included excess contract rent, the amount of rent actually being received over and above fair market value of rent, in its valuation of income producing real property.
|
|||||
| Yanosy v. Yanosy, FA000069272,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 23, 2001, Decided , February 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court ordered the party's marriage dissolved and entered property division and liability responsibility orders. Husband was to pay alimony. Retirement plans were divided equally, except for special orders for husband's railroad retirement.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
