|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 25, 2005
|
| |
|
| |
Miazga v. Santavenere, CV045000015,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 25, 2005, Decided , February 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Moran v. Ross, CV020174267S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 25, 2005, Decided , February 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The original lessor of a motor vehicle, which assigned the lease and sold the vehicle to a financing company, could not be liable under Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 14-154a for the vehicle operator's negligence because it had no interest in the vehicle when an accident occurred; the original lessor was granted summary judgment in a negligence action.
|
|
| |
Small Bus. Transp., Inc. v. ABC Stores, LLC, CV04084714,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 25, 2005, Decided , February 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Foreign corporation's suit to recover under a contract with local corporation was permissible under Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 33-920(6) because foreign corporation was one which obtained orders requiring acceptance outside state before they became contracts and under ? 33-920(11) because the foreign corporation transacted business in interstate commerce.
|
|
| |
Statewide Griev. Comm. v. Kennelly, CV040833515S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 25, 2005, Decided , February 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because an attorney was young, inexperienced, first-time violator, and remorseful, court reprimanded him for violating Conn. R. Prof. Conduct ?? 3.3(a)(1), 4.1(1), 8.4(3) by failing to disclose to the judge and opposing parties the amount of insurance coverage available to his defendant clients in negotiations to settle an underlying lawsuit.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback