 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People's Bank v. Otero, CV010385330S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 26, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court lacked the authority to open a valid judgment more than four months after the entry of the order where the sale had been approved, title to the property had passed, and the debt had been paid.
|
|||||
| Simian, Inc. v. Dunkin' Donuts, CV020079556S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 26, 2003, Decided , February 26, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The franchise owner established a reasonable degree of probability of success as to its deceptive practices claim against the franchisor. However, an injunction would have caused considerable harm to the second franchisee, who had no culpability.
|
|||||
| Simms v. Simms, FA780035162S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 26, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The ex-husband's dramatic increase in earnings constituted a substantial change in circumstances when compared to the time of the divorce, to the extent that neither party anticipated it would occur. Thus, the ex-wife's alimony was modified.
|
|||||
| Tillman v. Warden, CV023659,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 19 AT ROCKVILLE, February 26, 2003, Decided , February 26, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where inmate, during recreation, was shackled and handcuffed with tether running from wrists to ankles, this was not cruel and unusual. Restraints did not jeopardize inmate's health and were not excessive use of force, given the inmate's misbehavior.
|
|||||
| Tyler E. Lyman v. Anteon Corp., 561134,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 26, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Real estate broker was entitled to six percent commission under listing agreement signed by landlord's predecessor and tenant since listing agreement did not terminate with conveyance of property from predecessor to landlord, its corporate successor.
|
|||||
| Underwriters at Lloyds of London v. Lauretti's Piepont Tavern, CV02078675,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, February 26, 2003, Decided , February 26, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurer had no duty to defend restaurant or owner in underlying human rights commission action since the insurance policy excluded coverage for defendants' refusal to employ, termination of employment, discipline, or discrimination.
|
|||||
| Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A. v. Handy, 0561694,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 26, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In mortgagee's foreclosure action, trial court granted motion to strike counterclaims related to mortgagee's breach of forbearance agreement; mortgagors did not allege mortgage was modified, so agreement did not arise from same transaction.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
