Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Connecticut - February 27, 2004
	Therrien v. McDonald's, CV0822361S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 27, 2004, Decided , February 27, 2004, Filed View this case - free   Overview: In a personal injury action where a property owner sought to compel the victim to provide a blood sample, the owner had to show the need for such procedure, that there was no less intrusive means, and that it satisfied a reasonableness inquiry. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	YMCA of Stamford v. Bentley, 5794, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD, February 27, 2004, Filed View this case - free   Overview: A residential facility was a social organization, a resident was a member thereof, and the facility's housing portion was operated for the benefit of the organization; accordingly, the facility could lock out the resident for non-payment of rent. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Yost v. Bardell's Decorating Ctr., Inc., CV020067694S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, February 27, 2004, Decided , February 27, 2004, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Where owners filed suit against retail paint center alleging that center recommended unsuitable kind of paint for job, action failed, as failure of paint was caused by primer, and owners did not follow center's advice on primer. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.