|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 27, 2004
|
| |
Therrien v. McDonald's, CV0822361S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 27, 2004, Decided , February 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a personal injury action where a property owner sought to compel the victim to provide a blood sample, the owner had to show the need for such procedure, that there was no less intrusive means, and that it satisfied a reasonableness inquiry.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Yost v. Bardell's Decorating Ctr., Inc., CV020067694S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, February 27, 2004, Decided , February 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where owners filed suit against retail paint center alleging that center recommended unsuitable kind of paint for job, action failed, as failure of paint was caused by primer, and owners did not follow center's advice on primer.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|