 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sarasota CCM, Inc. v. Golf Mktg., LLC, AC 26181,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 28, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Certificate from secretary of state indicating that it had no record that an LLC was either a duly organized Connecticut LLC or foreign LLC, sufficed to establish that the named LLC was a fictitious entity, and entitled corporation to a turnover order of a bank account established by signatory in LLC's name to satisfy judgment against signatory.
|
|||||
| State v. Cliff Brown # 250099, CR00165262,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 28, 2006, Decided , February 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a sentencing judge considered the gruesome facts of a murder and justly determined that defendant was an extremely dangerous individual, pursuant to Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 43-23 et seq., and Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-194 et seq., a 50-year sentence was neither inappropriate nor disproportionate.
|
|||||
| State v. Dean, AC 24971,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 28, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a robbery case, excluding testimony that a victim knew defendant would not use a pipe he wielded was, at most, harmless, as defendant would have been convicted with the testimony as (1) Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-135(a)(2) only required proof he wielded the pipe, and (2) nothing showed the other victim present knew defendant would not use the pipe.
|
|||||
| State v. Harris, SC 17326,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 28, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In deciding whether to continue an acquittee's commitment after his crimes' maximum term, a trial court did not err in refusing to strike the Psychiatric Security Review Board's report as (1) it was relevant and not unfairly prejudicial; (2) the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause did not apply; and (3) admitting it did not violate due process.
|
|||||
| State v. Hedge, CR01169528,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant drove a car that contained crack cocaine while he was on probation, and because he failed to reappear for his probation revocation hearing, his sentence was not inappropriate or disproportionate and complied with the provisions of Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 43-23 et seq., and Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-194, et seq.
|
|||||
| State v. Henderson, CR01549535,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 28, 2006, Decided , February 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: 60 year sentence was not inappropriate or disproportionate for murder under Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 53a-54a, 53a-8, conspiracy to commit murder under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-54a, 53a-48, and witness tampering under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-151, 53a-8, where defendant ordered a man killed purely to reassert control over a drug selling enterprise.
|
|||||
| State v. Jeffreys, CR99151989,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 2 AT BRIDGEPORT, February 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Given nature of defendant's narcotics offenses, including selling drugs within 1500 feet of public housing project in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 21a-278(b), which carried three year mandatory minimum consecutive sentence, and given 20 year career criminal history, 18 year sentence satisfied Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 43-23 et seq.
|
|||||
| State v. Manns, CR04201037,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 2 AT BRIDGEPORT, February 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Given the longstanding, obsessive, and assaultive nature of petitioner's conduct toward the victim, petitioner's 4-year sentence for violating a standing criminal restraining order pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-223a was appropriate, not disproportionate, and complied with the provisions of Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 43-23 et seq.
|
|||||
| State v. Morales, CR96245863,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where inmate was sentenced to 52 and one-half years in prison for murder under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-54a, sentence was neither inappropriate or disproportionate under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 43-23 et seq. and Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-194 et seq., as crime involved taking of human life in order to protect criminal enterprise.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
