 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Abl Assocs. v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n of Manchester, CV 990591660,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, February 28, 2000, Decided , February 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to dismiss was granted because the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction in that there was no controversy, the parties interests were not adverse, and action by the court would not result in relief for plaintiff.
|
|||||
| Blossom v. Blossom, FA 970716431S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, February 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court ordered child support was based on reasonable potential earnings of respondent father.
|
|||||
| Boyce v. Donahue, CV 990171017,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 28, 2000, Decided , February 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff prevailed on his action to recover for damages he suffered as a result of defendant's conduct in a series of small claims actions, and malicious intent was established, so total damages were trebled.
|
|||||
| Brancato v. Christian, CV 990172713,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 28, 2000, Decided , February 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Out-of-state defendant's motion to dismiss was denied, because state longarm statute permitted the exercise of jurisdiction over him, and the due process clause of the federal constitution did not preclude such jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Caserta v. Parker, CV 0363275S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 28, 2000, Decided , February 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff was certified as class representative of class of limited partners invested in defendants' limited partnership, as he met all requirements for standing.
|
|||||
| Davis v. Warden, CV 9705773370,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, February 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Habeas corpus petition for ineffective assistance of counsel denied because outcome of trial would not have been different but for counsel's errors because petitioner merely denied having gun during altercation with police.
|
|||||
| Donald B., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 28, 2000, Decided , February 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Clear and convincing evidence showed termination of parental rights in best interest of child considering his needs, length of time he had been in foster care, child's need for permanency and totality of the circumstances.
|
|||||
| Esposito v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n of Hamden, 422907,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 28, 2000, Decided , February 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Re-zoning was affirmed; planning and zoning commission failure to file planning report was not fatal and land use proposal referral was timely. Rezoning request was not spot zoning since it was in harmony with land use plan.
|
|||||
| Evans v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., CV 9866087S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 28, 2000, Decided , February 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insured was entitled to judgment in breach of contract claim against insurer, for failing to pay loss claim, pursuant to boatowners insurance policy, because he established loss.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
