 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Abate v. Kelley, FA990089377,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, February 25, 2002, Decided , February 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In husband's action seeking reduction in alimony and child support payments, trial court concluded that husband was underemployed and, although it reduced husband's child support obligation, it ordered husband to seek higher-paying job.
|
|||||
| Electroformers, Inc. v. Richter, CV010343157S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 25, 2002, Decided , February 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee adequately alleged special defense of waiver to employer's claim of usurping business opportunity. Special defense of contributory negligence was stricken, as comparative negligence was not defense to breach of fiduciary duty claim.
|
|||||
| Ferrone v. Resnick, CV000443779S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Buyers' claims against seller after discovering property was not connected to public sewer line were denied; testimony did not demonstrate seller failed to perform any of his contractual obligations, and statute of limitations barred claim.
|
|||||
| Friedman v. Jamison Bus. Sys., CV010343518S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 25, 2002, Decided , February 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Choice of law provision in contract did not divest the court of jurisdiction. Use of the term "may" in the agreement was permissive, and did not confer exclusive jurisdiction on New York courts over matters arising out of the agreement.
|
|||||
| In re Brenda A., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, JUVENILE MATTERS AT NEW HAVEN, February 25, 2002, Decided , February 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court's judgment terminated mother's parental rights in her infant daughter citing that both tested positive for cocaine at birth, mother's chronic history of substance abuse, concerned foster parents, and daughter's best interests.
|
|||||
| In re Crystal H., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, JUVENILE MATTERS AT MIDDLETOWN, February 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Little v. Bauer, CV000801591S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 25, 2002, Decided , February 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where alleged damages in willful and malicious conduct claim arguably arose from son's entire course of conduct, genuine issue existed as to whether series of events was act or omission complained of under statute of limitations.
|
|||||
| Marotti v. St. Paul, CV000444878S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurer's motion to strike loss of consortium claim was denied where insured and husband did not expressly allege that insurance contract covered loss of consortium claims and trial court needed to see policy language to determine coverage.
|
|||||
| Mastroianni v. Mayor, CV990432044S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Hospital's motion for summary judgment in malpractice action was denied; an exclusive list of all defendants did not need be included on a petition to extend the statute of limitations pursuant to state statute.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
