 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alter v. Lawlor, CV990591658S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 27, 2003, Decided , February 27, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The injured parties alleged intentional infliction of emotional distress due to the receipt of threatening letters. Since they indicated their health was affected, that was sufficient to leave the issue of "severity" to the jury.
|
|||||
| Bielsa v. Barnum, 399978,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 27, 2003, Decided , February 27, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A client was entitled to a prejudgment remedy against a contractor in a breach of contract action stemming from work to have been done on an apartment because the client paid the contractor an $ 8,000 deposit, for which little work was done.
|
|||||
| Boice v. City of New Britain, CV000504976S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 27, 2003, Decided , February 27, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Landowner was denied summary judgment in negligence and nuisance suit by pedestrian who tripped on sidewalk, as pedestrian's deposition testimony did not adequately disprove her complaint's allegations that landowner's positive actions caused defect.
|
|||||
| Boice v. City of New Britain, CV000504976S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 27, 2003, Decided , February 27, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A construction company's summary judgment was denied as to an injured party's personal injury action; the company did not contradict a claim that the company caused damage to the sidewalk in question, which led to the injured party's fall.
|
|||||
| Bosak v. Marriott Senior Living Servs., CV000181443S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 27, 2003, Decided , February 27, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an suit by conservator of a person and her estate against senior living home for personal injuries, trial court, in summarily ruling on many motions, did not allow portions of amended complaint to contain breach of fiduciary duty allegations.
|
|||||
| Brancato v. Moriscato, CV030472496S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 27, 2003, Decided , February 27, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Authority existed to order that decedent's body be exhumed and that DNA testing be performed to determine if decedent was the putative daughter's father, as the putative daughter showed evidence that there was reason to believe she was his heir.
|
|||||
| Citifinancial Mortg. Co. v. Skyers, CV02389419S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 27, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where title had not transferred after a court sale, a court had jurisdiction to rescind a contract if it was equitable. Water damage, lack of reliance on sale confirmation, and the buyer's good standing supported rescission with partial forfeiture.
|
|||||
| Dykty v. Marcucio, CV000071199S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 27, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owner was entitled to damages for abutting property owner's trespasses onto the property owner's property and judgment on abutting property owner's counterclaim regarding tree branches overhanging abutting property owner's property.
|
|||||
| Hofffman v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Bridgeport, CV990365576S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 27, 2003, Decided , February 27, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court sustained property owner and citizen's appeal from zoning board decision granting applicants' request for variance to establish package store use within 1,500 feet of school; applicants did not prove unusual hardship.
|
|||||
| Lantner v. Lantner, FA970716655,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 27, 2003, Decided , February 27, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parties were ordered to share joint legal custody of children after court determined parties should practice secure parallel parenting. Wife was awarded primary physical custody during school and husband was awarded physical custody during summer.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
