LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Connecticut - February 25, 2002

  
Paul v. Levine, CV000180414S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 25, 2002, Decided , February 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Neither penalty nor liquidated damages contract provisions were to be enforced where no damage was sustained. Buyer in real estate contact was allowed to recover deposit in case of nonwillful default even where deposit was liquidated damages.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Schink v. Baker, CV990172704, CV990173901, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 25, 2002, Decided , February 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Home buyers failed to prove fraud as they failed to show that septic company deliberately induced them to think they were obtaining a larger septic system than was installed. There was no breach of contract as there was no meeting of the minds.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Carpenter, CR99250705, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 25, 2002, Decided , February 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In criminal prosecution, State's objection to tape of telephone call allegedly made to national radio talk show program was sustained where court found defense had not made prima facie showing that witness was person who made call.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.