|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 1, 2004
|
| |
Nationwide Prop. & Cas. Co. v. Hassler, CV 03 0478767 S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 1, 2004, Decided , March 1, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where there was no evidence that an insured attempted to slow or stop his vehicle upon seeing a truck blocking his lane as it backed into a driveway, the insurer could not recover for the insured's property damage from swerving to avoid a collision.
|
|
| |
Palmieri v. Statewide Griev. Comm., CV030519602S, CV030519603S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, March 1, 2004, Decided , March 1, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: There was no evidence to indicate that grievance committee made an attempt to contact an attorney who did not appear at a rescheduled hearing despite the fact he filed a detailed answer and indicated his intent to defend himself against the charges.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Rudder v. Mamanasco Lake Park Ass'n, CV020344537S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, March 1, 2004, Decided , March 1, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Property owners were not entitled to a declaration of adverse possession; the disputed property belonged to a park association, and the evidence indicated that other association members used the land in the same fashion as the owners.
|
|
| |
Ruotolo v. Estate of Swanson, CV 02 0464656 S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 1, 2004, Decided , March 1, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Interest of a stepdaughter, who did not survive the testator, passed to the testator's intestate estate, as the anti-lapse statute was inapplicable, because the will provided for a contingency for the bequest, the survival of the legatee.
|
|
| |
State v. New Eng. Health Care Emples. Union, Dist. 1199, CV030828663, CV 03-0828663,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 1, 2004, Decided , March 1, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: An arbitrator's award that required the parties to work out a remedy to a union's grievance against the State under the parties' CBA was not a final and definite award; such an award had to be vacated.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback