Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Connecticut - February 27, 2003
	Talton v. Warden, CV990002923, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 19 AT ROCKVILLE, February 27, 2003, Decided , February 27, 2003, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Claim of ineffective assistance of counsel required a showing of deficient performance and prejudice. While habeas petitioner may have had semblance of an alibi defense, it was not good one, and his trial defense counsel did a satisfactory job. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Tennant v. Tennant, FA020562722, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 27, 2003, Decided , February 27, 2003, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Implicit in a court's order requiring a wife to return goods to the marital home that she improperly removed was the requirement that she do so with reasonable care; using an open trailer on a rainy day was below that standard and was contempt. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Wiseman v. Armstrong, CV020821661S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 27, 2003, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Connecticut Patients' Bill of Rights included department of correction facilities. Motion to dismiss counts alleging actions and omissions of correctional officers violated the Patients' Bill of Rights relating to a mentally ill inmate was denied. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.