 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bard v. Comm'r of Motor Vehicles, (AC 19788),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 27, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although Maine's prohibited alcohol level was lower than Connecticut's, Connecticut license suspension was proper under interstate compact where evidence showed driver's level exceeded limits in both states.
|
|||||
| Barese v. Clark, (AC 20036),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 27, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the prosecutor did not abandon his prosecutor's role by addressing the criminal defendant's HIV claim at the sentencing hearing, which was part of the judicial process, he was protected by prosecutorial immunity.
|
|||||
| Biro v. Hirsch, (AC 19639),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 27, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants failed to state a claim against third-party defendant for conspiracy to commit extortion, because defendants did not allege a single act by any of the alleged conspirators in furtherance of the alleged conspiracy.
|
|||||
| Brightly v. Abbott Terrance Health Ctr., CV980148584S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 27, 2001, Decided , February 27, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because terminated worker failed to allege that the reasons of her termination contravened public policy, and worker was employed in a state that presumed that an employment contract was at-will, her tort action was properly dismissed.
|
|||||
| Citimortgage, Inc. v. Lovelett, CV000159430S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, February 27, 2001, Decided , February 27, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even though promissory note contained word "may" in referring to notice of default of mortgage, this did not mean giving notice was optional. As a matter of law, notice of default may have been required in order to accelerate and foreclose.
|
|||||
| Cox v. Cox, FA980168237S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 27, 2001, Decided , February 27, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion for immediate withholding of former husband's wages to pay alimony was denied. Former wife failed to prove that former husband failed to pay alimony for 30 consecutive days.
|
|||||
| Dowd v. Dowd, FA960712085S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 27, 2001, Decided , February 27, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Upon defendant wife's motion, the trial court ordered an increase in alimony. Such an increase was proper, because the increase in plaintiff husband's income by more than 16 percent was a substantial change in circumstances.
|
|||||
| Dower v. Dower, 0554832S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 27, 2001, Decided , February 27, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The appropriate timing to order separated husband to pay pendente lite alimony was established by the trial court as the date which the court could have realistically held a hearing on the matter.
|
|||||
| Green v. Connecticut Disposal Serv., (AC 19736),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 27, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dispute about promissory notes, the court affirmed orders confirming arbitration award and denying application to vacate the award. Guarantors were estopped from claiming they had not agreed to arbitration. Award did not exceed submission.
|
|||||
| In re Daelyon C., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, February 27, 2001, Decided , February 27, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The parental rights of parents in their minor children were terminated where the court found by clear and convincing evidence that termination of their parental rights was in the best interest of each child.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
