 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Abou-Mansour v. Asset Builders Remodeling, LLC, CV085012299S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD AT BRIDGEPORT, July 22, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mechanic's lien was discharged as contract was signed by a member of the contractor, but the contractor did not show that it was a registered home improvement contractor since the best evidence would have been submission of the certificate of registration under Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 20-420a(d), 20-420b, and 20-420.
|
|||||
| Blum v. Blum, AC 28101, AC 28532,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, July 22, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly construed Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-86(b) in denying a husband's motions to modify his alimony and child support obligations because he failed to prove that his wife's cohabitation altered her financial needs. There was no evidence from which to infer the value of a cohabitant's contributions to the wife's financial resources.
|
|||||
| Carter v. Comm'r of Corr., AC 28712,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, July 22, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's claims that habeas court improperly dismissed his second petition successive under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 23-29(3) was not reviewed, as his failure to file transcript of first habeas trial prevented appellate court from determining whether allegedly new evidence reasonably could have been raised in original petition.
|
|||||
| Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. Tager, SC 18021, SC 18023, SC 18026, SC 18022,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, July 22, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a creditor's damage award against the debtor's former attorney was reduced by the amount the creditor obtained in the debtor's bankruptcy case, the trial court improperly reduced the verdict because it was entirely possible that the jury intended the damage award to include only partial reimbursement for the debt.
|
|||||
| Crawley v. Crawley, FA074106673,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON AT NORWICH, July 22, 2008, Decided, July 22, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dissolution of marriage action, the parties' marriage was ordered dissolved on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown. Although the husband was mostly responsible for the breakdown of the parties' marriage, the wife's education, vocation, and occupation gave her much greater present income and potentially more in the future than the husband.
|
|||||
| In re Kevin K., AC 28577,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, July 22, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Admission of one of the written statements of a juvenile was improper under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-137(a) because there was no evidence that supported the conclusion that the child or his parent made a valid decision to enter a voluntary admission that was not a product of coercion, suggestion, or ignorance of rights.
|
|||||
| In re Reynaldo B., H14CP07009010A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, JUVENILE MATTERS, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, July 22, 2008, Decided, July 22, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Clear and convincing evidence supported termination of parents' rights over their child due to their neglect, abandonment, and lack of ongoing relationship with the child under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-112(j)(3)(A), (D), and (E), as well as the child's best interest under § 17a-112(j) and (k).
|
|||||
| Jimenez v. DeRosa, AC 28034,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, July 22, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A default judgment was set aside and the complaint dismissed where the injured plaintiffs had not established personal jurisdiction over defendant motorist because abode service under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-57 was improperly made at a former residence. The motorist's collateral attack on the judgment was not untimely under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-212.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. Comm'r of Corr., SC 17997,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, July 22, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was proper to deny an inmate's second petition for a writ of habeas corpus because his first habeas counsel did not render ineffective assistance by failing to raise the issue of trial counsel's failure to present the testimony of a ballistics expert when a ballistics expert would not have been helpful in establishing self-defense.
|
|||||
| Lowenadler v. Mallard, DBDCV085004054S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY AT DANBURY, July 22, 2008, Decided, July 22, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to strike negligence count was granted as complaint alleged that assistant principals' duty to supervise student was based on employment; that summons named them individually did not control under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-45a and Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 8-1(a) as complaint showed they were being sued in official capacities.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
