 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hecht v. Staskiewicz, CV990423243S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 26, 2002, Decided , February 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Legislature defined in clear unambiguous language the payments it considered a collateral source. The statute did not define a decision by medical provider to "write-off" any balance due from the injured party as a collateral source payment.
|
|||||
| In re Candace H., (SC 16555),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 26, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Visitation issue was rendered moot by mother's voluntary relinquishment of parental rights. Vacatur was commonly used to prevent judgment, unreviewable due to mootness, from spawning any legal consequences and was used to vacate judgment.
|
|||||
| In re Steven M. 1, (AC 20866),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 26, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile lacked standing to challenge constitutionality of statute on its face. Juvenile was denied due process of law because trial court improperly failed to determine his competency prior to ordering his transfer.
|
|||||
| Papas Group v. Turner, 559336,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 26, 2002, Decided , February 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The lessees' special defense, which alleged constructive eviction, did not survive the lessor's motion to strike; the lessees failed to plead that the lessor caused the condition that allegedly constructively evicted them.
|
|||||
| Pinchbeck v. Guilford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV980412007S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Special defense in zoning appeal was stricken where court was not of opinion that decision regarding jurisdiction was clearly erroneous and would work manifest injustice if followed.
|
|||||
| Roberge v. Physicians Health Servs., CV000379503S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, February 26, 2002, Decided , February 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In individual's suit under statute for disclosure of his personal medical information, court denied insurance related agency provider's motion to dismiss since individual had private cause of action, and granted recipient's motion to dismiss.
|
|||||
| Schain v. Schain, FA000156786S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, REGIONAL FAMILY TRIAL DOCKET, February 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court dissolved parties' marriage and entered orders regarding child custody, visitation, decision making, property division, child support, alimony, and attorney's fees.
|
|||||
| State v. Aponte, (SC 16546),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 26, 2002, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court sufficiently instructed jury on specific intent. Each element of conspiracy was given. Because trial court's deadly weapon instruction was qualified, burden of proof was not impermissibly shifted.
|
|||||
| State v. Brandy, CR98462896,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 6, AT NEW HAVEN, February 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence review division affirmed judgment of five-year prison sentence imposed by superior court for petitioner's violation of probation. Record did not disclose any increase in sentence due to alleged personal conflict of counsel and judge.
|
|||||
| State v. Cotten, CR6396330,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentences were neither inappropriate nor disproportionate due to defendant's intentional act inflicted on four-year old child, his outrageous criminal history, failure to accept responsibility, and lack of remorse.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
