|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - February 28, 2003
|
| |
Pontbriand v. Dance City & the Arts, CV020514753S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, February 28, 2003, Decided , February 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where the parties had entered into a valid contract and the teacher failed in major respects to perform her duties thereunder, termination of the contract prior to its stated date was permissible.
|
|
| |
Reaves v. Hartford Courant Co., X07CV020079871S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, AT TOLLAND, February 28, 2003, Decided , February 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The articles in question communicated a rational and reasonable interpretation of the ambiguous court proceedings regarding the injured party's part in the automobile-related death despite the fact that another interpretation was also possible.
|
|
| |
Rockville Gen. Hosp. v. Wirzulis, CV000072868,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 28, 2003, Decided , February 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A patient was not obligated to pay for the cost of an intensive care room at a hospital; the patient agreed to stay only if he was put in a semi-private room, and he would not have stayed, if he knew that he would be placed in intensive care.
|
|
| |
Sammartino v. Turn, CV99070151,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, February 28, 2003, Decided , February 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In an action for slander against a town and a town official, who was acting in his capacity as a first selectman, governmental immunity was a complete defense to the action as to both the town and the town official, and summary judgment was proper.
|
|
| |
Spicer's Noank Inner Marina v. Noank Fire Dist. Zoning Comm'n, 559534,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 28, 2003, Decided , February 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court required 20-foot fire lane and otherwise affirmed fire zoning commission's site plan approval; plan to remodel existing buildings did not enlarge preexisting non-conforming uses of waterfront district land but added conforming uses.
|
|
| |
Utay v. Farp Assocs., CV010810555S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 28, 2003, Decided , February 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where there was no private cause of action for an unfair insurance practices claim, summary judgment could be granted; it was unavailable for the buyer's other claims, as there were material issues of fact in dispute.
|
|
| |
Wills v. Wills, CV020187524S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 28, 2003, Decided , February 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: For a dismissal based on the convenience of witnesses, a specific showing of inconvenience that was sufficiently prejudicial was needed. Where husband did not provide such information, his motion to dismiss was denied.
|
|
| |
Zoll v. Zoll, FA010728633,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, February 28, 2003, Decided , February 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where the husband had a gambling problem and asserted that he paid large portions of his business's gross income to a business partner, he lacked credibility. He failed to prove that he was required to share profits with the alleged business partner.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback