 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Malik v. Adm'r, Unemployment Comp. Act, CV044006095,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 2, 2006, Decided , March 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an unemployment compensation appeal under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-249b where the claimant was discharged for willful misconduct, the appeal was dismissed. The court was bound by the appeals referee's conclusion that the employer provided sufficient evidence to establish that the claimant committed an act of willful misconduct.
|
|||||
| Shakir v. Rothman, CV045000289S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 2, 2006, Decided , March 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
