 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Amato v. Maura, CV065001115S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 1, 2007, Decided , March 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment motion was denied as there were disputed facts as to whether host one facilitated consumption of alcohol by minor driver since there was evidence that driver was not infrequent visitor to host one's home, that on occasions, he consumed alcohol there, and that driver was consuming vodka at host one's home on afternoon of accident.
|
|||||
| Benson v. Estrada, DBDCV065001213S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, March 1, 2007, Decided , March 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Transit district's motion to dismiss plaintiff's action alleging negligent hiring and other causes of action arising out of the sexual assault of a plaintiff by a bus driver was granted, as plaintiffs failed to make service of process upon a member of the district's board of directors as required by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-273h(a).
|
|||||
| Janson v. New Century Dev. Corp., CV000370316,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 1, 2007, Decided , March 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was entered in favor of home buyers on their claims against corporate builder regarding defects in the home the buyers purchased but not against builder's sole shareholder; although shareholder made all corporate decisions, that fact alone was insufficient to support piercing corporate veil to make shareholder liable for builder's actions.
|
|||||
| McCown v. Warden, CV030004172,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, March 1, 2007, Decided , March 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate failed to show that his trial and appellate counsel were ineffective in violation of U.S. Const. amends. VI and XIV and Conn. Const. art. I, § 8 with respect to his request for habeas corpus relief, as his claims either lacked merit or were tactical decisions by counsel, or did not cause the inmate any prejudice.
|
|||||
| Michelina's Pizza, LLC v. Valie, CV044000086S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, March 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alleged subcontractor who operated a pizza business was not entitled to recover on a counterclaim for lost wages because he was a subcontractor based on the language of the parties' agreements and operated his business free of interference by plaintiffs; thus, he was not an employee who could claim lost wages.
|
|||||
| Ouellette v. Provencher, CV055000143S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, March 1, 2007, Decided , March 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court granted the alleged tortfeasors' request for leave to amend their answer to add a counterclaim asserting driver was liable to them for negligence despite fact that request was filed beyond Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-584's two-year limitations period; counterclaim could be added under that statute since pleadings had not "finally closed."
|
|||||
| Rosa v. State Siting Counsel, HHBCV054007974S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, March 1, 2007, Decided , March 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Landowners had not shown that the Siting Council erred in approving a certificate of compatibility and public need in regard to a telecommunications facility under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 16-50p. The Council had examined alternate sites and potential adverse environmental effects and had heard testimony about the need for coverage in the affected area.
|
|||||
| Rosenblit v. Laschever, CV054013537S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 1, 2007, Decided , March 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where clients alleged that an attorney breached an oral contract and engaged in legal malpractice by failing to record a mortgage deed, to secure a title policy, and to begin foreclosure proceedings, the claims failed because, inter alia, there was no credible evidence that the attorney was retained to foreclose on the property.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
