 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Walthall, (AC 20305),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 27, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions for arson and attempted larceny were affirmed where the evidence was sufficient and where he failed to present an adequate record on appeal to make a challenge to the jury's racial content.
|
|||||
| Steele v. Steele, FA000553443,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 27, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court denied the State's purported agreement to support filed in a divorce action after the final decree in which the court had found no arrearage. Trying to amend the judgment could only be done, if at all, by a motion to open the judgment.
|
|||||
| Town of Winchester v. Northwest Assocs., (SC 16349),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, February 27, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed the denial of plaintiff's motion for a deficiency judgment relating to the foreclosure of a tax lien; there was nothing in the relevant statutes to suggest that a deficiency judgment was available in a tax lien foreclosure.
|
|||||
| Van Nest v. Kegg, FA980164690S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK AT STAMFORD, February 27, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court partially granted plaintiff's motion for articulation; as of the date of the hearing, plaintiff had been providing health insurance for the parties minor children, and therefore plaintiff was not in willful contempt on that issue.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
