 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Massad v. E. Conn. Cable TV, Inc., 550432,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, February 28, 2001, Decided , February 28, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where cable franchise holder provided public access user with phone lines, and slanderous remarks were made over phone lines, franchise holder was not liable since it was prohibited from exercising editorial control of public access programming.
|
|||||
| Nuzzo v. Hitchcock, CV990428801S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 28, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant wife had no special relationship with her husband or with plaintiff which imposed a duty upon defendant wife to control the conduct of her husband.
|
|||||
| Olivas v. DeVivo Indus., CV990335908S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, February 28, 2001, Decided , February 28, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court granted a former employer's motion to dismiss several counts and prayers for punitive damages and attorney fees, but not negligent creation of emotional distress, in the employee's suit involving charges for theft of a paycheck.
|
|||||
| Rairan v. Marro, CV990175358S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 28, 2001, Decided , February 28, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Despite fact that tenant's motion to strike condominium owner's special defenses was technically defective, trial court was able to ascertain intent of motion through body of motion itself, and it was therefore allowed.
|
|||||
| Shafton v. DSL.Net, Inc., CV000438890,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, February 28, 2001, Decided , February 28, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to strike in breach of contract action granted where existence of statutory remedy precluded plaintiff from bringing common-law wrongful discharge action and plaintiff had other vehicles of legal redress for proven violation of public policy.
|
|||||
| Vancini v. Fleet Nat'l Bank, CV970162677S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, February 28, 2001, Decided , February 28, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant bank was not entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff's premises liability claim; a genuine issue of fact existed on who had possession or control of the parking lot where plaintiff allegedly fell at the time the accident occurred.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
