|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - April 10, 2002
|
| |
Comm'r of Transp. Conn. v. Schucchmann, CV010074616S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 5 AT DERBY, April 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The court found that the value of property owners' condemned property was $ 37,752, based on selling prices of other properties in the area, and considering that the property contained wetlands and other detracting factors.
|
|
| |
|
| |
In re Bershunie W., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, JUVENILE MATTERS AT MIDDLETOWN, April 10, 2002, Decided , April 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Superior court found child delinquent under two statutes when child, with intent to cause annoyance, engaged in fighting, violent and threatening behavior, and used abusive and obscene language, all in public place, and caused injury to another.
|
|
| |
Kiniry v. Kiniry, FA980163981S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, April 10, 2002, Decided , April 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
State v. 10,820.00 in United States Currency, CV00201AF,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, April 10, 2002, Decided , April 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's motion to dismiss a forfeiture petition filed by the State was granted, because the petition was not filed within the statutory 90 day time frame, and the court therefore lacked jurisdiction to hear the motion.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Zbras v. Knecht, CV00069684,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, April 10, 2002, Decided , April 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Adjuster was not employe or agent of insurer where owners failed to allege that insurer led them to believe adjuster was its employee or agent, and adjuster's actions would not be sufficient to support such an allegation.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback