 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Adams v. Envtl. Prot. Bd., FSTCV064010316S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, July 24, 2008, Decided, July 24, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A property owner had not sustained his burden of proof with respect to his claims of predisposition made with respect to either a Chairman or Board Member a the question propounded by the Chairman was no more than an attempt to understand the application and the Board Member made his comments after extensive discussion.
|
|||||
| Allston v. Hous. Auth. of New Haven, CV075012207S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT NEW HAVEN, July 24, 2008, Decided, July 24, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A housing authority's motion for summary judgment was granted in a resident's action to recover for injuries she sustained when she fell on housing authority property because the document a housing authority employee filled out regarding the resident's action was not submitted to the requisite officials pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. ¿ 8-67.
|
|||||
| Baker v. Gilhooly, CV065003939,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD AT HARTFORD, July 24, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment motion was granted as seller's negligence third-party claim was filed more than four years after closing in which agent erroneously disclosed to buyers that property was connected to a public sewer system, when it actually had its own septic system.
|
|||||
| Bumpus v. Tropiano, CV085016412,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN AT NEW HAVEN, July 24, 2008, Decided, July 24, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court granted operator's motion to strike count two alleging operator's reckless driving led to the death of decedent, warranting a double or treble damage award; to obtain such an award pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 14-295 required pleading of specific facts as set forth in Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. ¿ 10-1, which was not done.
|
|||||
| Gozzo v. Simsbury Zoning Comm'n, CV074015865S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, July 24, 2008, Decided, July 24, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the special permits imposed by the Zoning Commission included certain conditions which were invalid under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 8-2, including the condition that the special exception would not run with the property, the matter had to be remanded to the Commission.
|
|||||
| Hankey v. Hankey, CV0440182133S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY AT WATERBURY, July 24, 2008, Decided, July 24, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs sued defendants for beach of contract, breach of implied agreement, and promissory estoppel. These claims failed, as plaintiffs did not prove by preponderance of the evidence that an express oral contract or an implied oral agreement was formed between the parties, or that defendants made a promise on which they detrimentally relied.
|
|||||
| In re Jaylin M., F04CP05006629A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, July 24, 2008, Decided, July 24, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father's parental rights were terminated under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 17a-112(j)(3)(G) as to do so was in child's best interests as father had been convicted of sexual assault under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 53a-72a, resulting in conception of child. Father had sexually assaulted adoptive daughter (mother) for 13 years.
|
|||||
| Jennings v. Aldridge, CV075009174,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD AT HARTFORD, July 24, 2008, Decided, July 24, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was entered for buyers as fraudulent conveyance action was barred by Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 52-552j since buyer two was insider under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 52-552b(7), and transfer was made more than one year before suit was filed. Sellers knew property had been conveyed to buyer one in 1995, and did not serve complaint until February 20, 2007.
|
|||||
| Lazure v. Lazure, TTDFA074006851S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND AT ROCKVILLE, July 24, 2008, Decided, July 24, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 46b-82, the court saw no persuasive reason to limit the length of time for that portion of the alimony as requested by the husband since there was a significant disparity between the wife's ability to earn future income and the husband's earning ability in the neighborhood of $ 150,000 per year.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
