 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lodovico v. Tabacco & Sons Builders, CV 980491995S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, May 17, 2000, Decided , May 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In breach of contract action, subcontractor was awarded judgment where he was prevented by general contractor from completing performance when he was ready and able to complete the work within time period established by the contract.
|
|||||
| McKeone v. Manchester I-84 Assocs., CV 980583788S, CV 990589401S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, May 17, 2000, Decided , May 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was denied summary judgment in slip-and-fall case, as defendant owed plaintiff a duty and fact issue existed whether defendant had knowledge of dangerous condition. Indemnity issue was contingent on negligence.
|
|||||
| O'Connell v. Bridgeport Hosp., CV 990362525S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, May 17, 2000, Decided , May 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Wife of deceased sufficiently alleged wrongful death, loss of consortium, and negligent infliction of emotional distress based on hospital's failure to follow instructions regarding removal of deceased husband's life support.
|
|||||
| Penske Truck Leasing Co. v. Town of E. Windsor, CV 980492502S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, May 17, 2000, Decided , May 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Commerce Clause did not require Connecticut ad valorem tax on plaintiff's trucks with situs in defendant city for more than three months to be apportioned with Kentucky excise tax based upon Kentucky miles driven for use of Kentucky highways.
|
|||||
| Peploe v. Dolan, CV 990428841S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, May 17, 2000, Decided , May 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs were entitled to recover punitive damages because of the fraudulent nature of defendants' failure to disclose defects in the property, and the court granted plaintiffs' motion to determine an appropriate award.
|
|||||
| Pollock v. Panjabi, File No. CV970402199S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, May 17, 2000, Decided , May 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Witness immunity did not apply to poor performance claim, defendant experts engaged in aggravating conduct under the "cigarette test," and respondeat superior supported motion denial for defendant university.
|
|||||
| State v. Harper, CR 99285279,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, May 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trooper was justified in stopping defendant's vehicle for investigative purposes because he had a reasonable and articulable suspicion that defendant's vehicle had illegal windows, and a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity.
|
|||||
| State v. Mukhtaar, (SC 15801),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, May 17, 2000, * Officially Released * May 17, 2000, the date that this decision was released as a slip opinion, is the operative date for all substantive and procedural purposes.
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State did not discriminate in jury selection where excluded juror stated she might hesitate to convict even if charges were proven, and general inquiry of individual jurors after claim of jury bias did not violate right to trial by impartial jury.
|
|||||
| Thomas D., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, May 17, 2000, Decided , May 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Biological parental rights terminated in child's best interests for abandonment by father, neglect, and no ongoing parent/child relationship; reunification was not in child's best permanency interests due to strong ties to four-year foster parents.
|
|||||
| Turner v. Frowein, (SC 16165),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, May 17, 2000, * Officially Released * May 17, 2000, the date that this decision was released as a slip opinion, is the operative date for all substantive and procedural purposes.
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court could not properly deny a Dutch father's request for return of a minor child unless it had evaluated the full range of placement options to ensure the child's safe and preserved the home country's jurisdiction.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
